Relationships in the Digital Age: Self-disclosure and Communication in Social Networking Sites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.1.16.31632Keywords:
relationship, computer-mediated communication, social network sites, penetration, self-disclosureAbstract
With the development of new technologies and rise of social media, the desire to communicate and share information is seen as a primary driver of social networking sites, where the aspect of self-disclosure becomes one of the key characteristics for interpersonal attraction. The aim of the research is to examine how people communicate, self-disclose and maintain relationships on social networking sites and to find out how the use of computer-mediated communication relates to relational development and maintenance. MTurk tool and social media posts were utilized to gather information. Statistical data analysis program SPSS was employed: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and scale analysis and construction were performed. The investigation revealed significant differences between males and females self-disclosure practices on social networking site Facebook with outstanding differences depending upon the country of living, relationship status, perceived positive and negative rewards, benefits and satisfaction. The results of the study open path for future research within the framework of communication privacy management theory in line with the social penetration theory with an aim to analyse how self-disclosure inter-correlates with privacy concerns.
Keywords: relationship; computer-mediated communication; social network sites; penetration; self-disclosure.
References
https://sproutsocial.com/insights/facebook-stats-for-marketers/
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (2012). Social penetration theory. In E. Griffin (Ed.), A first look at communication theory (Vol. 8, pp. 113–125). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.111.479.1009-a
Altman, I., Taylor, D., & Sorrentino, R. (1969). Interpersonal exchange as a function of rewards and costs and situational factors: Expectancy confirmation-disconfirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(3), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90057-2
Ampong, G. O. A., Mensah, A., Adu, A. S. Y., Addae, J. A., Omoregie, O. K., & Ofori, K. S. (2018). Examining self-disclosure on social networking sites: A flow theory and privacy perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 8(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060058
Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., & Pantic, I. (2016). Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 701–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.026
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6 (1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, Z. W. Y., & Chan, T. K. H. (2015). Self-Disclosure in Social Networking Sites: The Role of Perceived Cost, Perceived Benefits and Social Influence, Internet research. 25(2), 279–299. Durham University. Retrieved from http://dro.dur.ac.uk/24034/1/24034.pdf?DDD2+cwxv81+d700tmt
Dean, B., (2020). Social Network Usage & Growth Statistics: How Many People Use Social Media in Backlinko. https://backlinko.com/social-media-users
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Ellison, N. B., & Boyd, D. M. (2013). Sociality through Social Network Sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.001.0001
Gilem, J. A., & Gilem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. In Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education Calculating (pp. 82–88). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-88933-1.50023-4
Hall, J. A., & Pennington, N. (2013). Self-monitoring, honesty, and cue use on Facebook: The relationship with user extraversion and conscientiousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1556–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.001
Hart, J., Nailling E., Bizer, G. Y., Collins, C. K. (2015) Attachment theory as a framework for explaining engagement with Facebook in Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 77, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.016
Huang, H. Y. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individual’s self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.030
Kemp, S. (2020). Global Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview. DataReportal, 20 January 2020. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview
Krämer, N. C., & Schäwel, J. (2020). Mastering the challenge of balancing self-disclosure and privacy in social media. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.003
Ku, Y. C., Chen, R., & Zhang, H. (2013). Why do users continue using social networking sites? An exploratory study of members in the United States and Taiwan. Information and Management, 50(7), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.011
Li, K., Cheng, L., & Teng, C. (2020). Voluntary sharing and mandatory provision: Private information disclosure on social networking sites. Information Processing and Management, 57(1), 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102128
Lin, X., & Wang, X. (2020). Examining gender differences in people’s information-sharing decisions on social networking sites. International Journal of Information Management, 50 (January 2019), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.004
Lin, C. P. (2011). Assessing the mediating role of online social capital between social support and instant messaging usage. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.08.003
Lin, R., & Utz, S. (2017). Self-disclosure on SNS: Do disclosure intimacy and narrativity influence interpersonal closeness and social attraction? Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.012
Osatuyi, B., Passerini, K., Ravarini, A., & Grandhi, S. A. (2018). “Fool me once, shame on you… then, I learn.” An examination of information disclosure in social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.018
Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated Rating Scale Construction, 21(1), 1–73. Retrieved from https://home.ubalt.edu/tmitch/645/articles/Summated Rating Scales.pdf
Statista (2020) Business Data Paltform. https://www.statista.com/markets/418/technology-telecommunications/
Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076
Vaitkevicius, R., Saudargiene, A. (2006). Statistika su SPSS psichologiniuose tyrimuose. Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University Press.
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting Different Conceptualizations of System Use: The Competing Roles of Behavioral Intention, Facilitating Conditions and Behavioral Expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148853
Vogels, E. A., & Anderson, M. (2020). Dating and Relationships in the Digital Age. Retrieved May 30, 2020, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/05/08/dating-and-relationships-in-the-digital-age/
Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). the Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship To Self‐Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This article is an Open Access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
