Framing of Information, Psychological Distance, and Belief in Health Related Information under Time Pressure in Older Adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.1.17.32476Abstract
The time of pandemics could be described by the overflow of health related news in media, but also the rise of researches concerning it. However, there is still a lack of information about message characteristics which effect belief in it, besides older people are underrepresented in these studies. Belief in fake news is especially dangerous for older people, not only because fake news usually promotes dangerous behavior (e.g. do not seek COVID-19 vaccination), but also because older people are the ones who are most likely to share fake news on social media in such way helping to spread them. The aim of the study was to estimate the influence of information framing and psychological distance on belief in health related information under time pressure in older adults. Study was based on representable sample of 50 years and older Lithuanians. In total 505 participants took part in the study. 200 (30,6 %) were men, 305 (60,4%) were women. Participants ranged in age from 50 to 94 with the mean age of 66,27 (SD = 11,24). Study was a between-subject design experiment. Belief in Health related news information served as a dependent variable, Framing of Information and Psychological Distance as independent variables, also age, gender and education were control variables. Participants were presented with eight fake and eight true news headlines about vaccination and COVID-19 in the form of social media posts for 7 seconds and had to evaluate their belief in these headlines. Results indicate, that neither psychological distance, nor information framing have any influence on overall belief in health related information in older adults. Even though gender and education were not related to overall belief in news, a significant positive correlation between age and belief in health related information was found. Our research prove that older people become more truth biased with age.
References
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Balmas, M. (2014). When Fake News Becomes Real: Combined Exposure to Multiple News Sources and Political Attitudes of Inefficacy, Alienation, and Cynicism. Communication Research, 41(3), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212453600
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/29b4j
Baptista, J., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review. Social Sciences. 9. doi: 10.3390/socsci9100185
Bastick, Z. (2021). Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? An experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633
Bedard, M., & Schoenthaler, C. (2018). Satire or Fake News. Companion of the the Web Conference 2018 on the Web Conference 2018 -WWW’18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188732
Beauvais, C. (2022). Fake news: Why do we believe it? Joint Bone Spine, 89(4), 105371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371
Blanco-Herrero, D., Amores, J. J., & Sánchez-Holgado, P. (2021). Citizen Perceptions of Fake News in Spain: Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Ideological Differences. Publications, 9(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9030035
Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac. 2018.09.005
Bryanov, K., & Vziatysheva, V. (2021). Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0253717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717
Corbu, N., Bargaoanu, A.,Durach, F., & Udrea, G. (2021). Fake News Going Viral: The Mediating Effect Of Negative Emotions. 4. 58-85
Donovan, R.J., Jalleh, G. (2000) Positive versus Negative Framing of a Hypothetical Infant Immunization: The Influence of Involvement. Health Education & Behavior. 27(1), 82-95. doi:10.1177/109019810002700108
Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. (2020). The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. Doi: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-48
Eurostat (2022) https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Population_structure_and_ageig (žiūrėta 2022 10 06)
Greene, C. M., & Murphy, G. (2021). Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(4), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000371
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019) Less than you think: Prevalence and pradictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5 (4586), 1-8. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Hartley, C. A., & Phelps, E. A.(2012) Anxiety and Decision-Making. Biological Psychiatry, 72(2), 113-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.027.
Hilbig, B. E. (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 983-986. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
Hilbig, B. E. (2012). How framing statistical statements affects subjective veracity: Validation and application of a multinomial model for judgments of truth. Cognition, 125, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.009
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (2020). Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then. Experimental Psychology, 67(5), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000493
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (2019). Less Than I Expected and oh so True? On the Interplay Between Expectations and Framing Effects in Judgments of Truth. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(5–6), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19869392
Jihyun, P., Su Hyun, K., & Jung Guk, K. (2020) Effects of message framing and health literacy on intention to perform diabetes self-care: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 161, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108043.
Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., Jolles, D., & Whiley, L.A. (2021). Are COVID-19 conspiracies a threat to public health? Psychological characteristics and health protective behaviours of believers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 969-989. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2796.
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lee, J. J., Kang, K. A., Wang, M. P., Zhao, S. Z., Wong, J. Y. H., O’Connor, S., Yang, S. C., & Shin, S. (2020). Associations Between COVID-19 Misinformation Exposure and Belief With COVID-19 Knowledge and Preventive Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Online Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11), e22205. https://doi.org/10.2196/22205
Littau, J., & Stewart, D. R. “Chip.” (2015). “Truthiness” and Second-Level Agenda Setting: Satire News and Its Influence on Perceptions of Television News Credibility. Electronic News, 9(2), 122–136. doi: ://doi.org/10.1177/1931243115581416
Luong, G., Charles, S. T., & Fingerman, K. L. (2011). Better with age - Social relationships across adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28 (1), 9-23. DOI: 10.1177/0265407510391362
Kwon, K. H., Pellizzaro, K., Shao, C., & Chadha, M. (2022). “I Heard That COVID-19 Was. . .”: Rumors, Pandemic, and Psychological Distance. American Behavioral Scientist, 000276422110660. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211066026
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
McCaul, K. D., Johnson, R. J., & Rothman, A. J. (2002). The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychology, 21(6), 624–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.21.6.624
McGonagle, T. (2017). “Fake news”: False fears or real concerns? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051917738685
Melchior, C., & Oliveira, M. (2022). Health-related fake news on social media platforms: A systematic literature review. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1500–1522. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038762
Mikuličiūtė, V., Jurkuvėnas, V., Pakalniškienė, V., Ivleva, V. (2022) Fake News: More Time to Read, Less Possibilities to Believe? 17th European Congress of Psychology. Book of Abstracts. 31, 304.
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
Nielsen, R.K., & Graves, L. (2017). "News you don't believe": Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved September 25, 2022, from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/news-you-dont-believe-audience-perspectives-fake-news
Shamaskin, A. M., Mikels, J. A., & Reed, A. E. (2010). Getting the message across: Age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018431
Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008
Sindermann, C., Schmitt, H. S., Rozgonjuk, D., Elhai, J. D., & Montag, C. (2021, March). The evaluation of fake and true news: on the role of intelligence, personality, interpersonal trust, ideological attitudes, and news consumption. Heliyon, 7(3), e06503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06503
Pehlivanoglu, D., Lighthall, N. R., Lin, T., Chi, K. J., Polk, R., Perez, E., Cahill, B. S., & Ebner, N. C. (2022). Aging in an “infodemic”: The role of analytical reasoning, affect, and news consumption frequency on news veracity detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(3), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000426
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The Psychology of Fake News. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Rosenblatt, D. H., Bode S., Dixon, H., Murawski, C., Summerell, P., Ng, A., & Wakefield, M. (2018) Health warnings promote healthier dietary decision making: Effects of positive versus negative message framing and graphic versus text-based warnings. Appetite, 127, 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.006
Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & van der Linden, S. (2020, October). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
Tang, Y. & Chooi, W. (2021) A systematic review of the effects of positive versus negative framing on cancer treatment decision making. Psychology & Health. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.2006197
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This article is an Open Access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
