Corporate Social Responsibility – Assessment of Facilitating and Impeding Factors for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Latvia


  • Oļegs Ņikadimovs EKA University of Applied Sciences



corporate social responsibility, small and medium enterprises, Latvia, transition economy


Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) make up for ~99% of all companies in both Latvia and the European Union (EU), they are a significant contributor to national economies and should not be disregarded when discussing corporate social responsibility (CSR). SMEs are not smaller-scale versions of corporations and differ greatly in terms of managerial structure, revenues, resource availability and allocation, market reach, product and service lines, as well as available manpower. Given that a CSR strategy often necessitates additional investment, many SMEs might not anticipate it to increase the bottom line, however, a large part of consumers are willing to pay more for goods and services from a socially responsible company, and CSR can facilitate higher employee attraction and retention rates. This sets up the aim of this study, to analyse CSR initiatives deployment, and facilitating and impeding factors for SMEs in Latvia, a country that is considered to be in the transition process to a market economy. To classify important CSR facilitating and impeding factors, analysis and generalisation of multiple academic sources were used. Analysis of the regulatory framework, fundamental planning documents, international CSR, ESG and other indices, as well as a collateral examination of empirical CSR research in the EU member states and Latvia, was carried out to identify possible CSR development issues for SMEs in Latvia. The study shows that while CSR awareness is increasing in Latvia, the implementation of CSR by SMEs is limited, and there is a need for more guidance and support to promote CSR practices. The study identifies several facilitating factors, such as policy-regulatory support, social pressure, ethical considerations, and impeding factors, such as lack of resources, limited knowledge, and perceived low relevance of CSR for business, as well as the excessively bureaucratic approach in the public sector. The study highlights the importance of private and NGO stakeholder engagement with the public sector in the collaboration and promotion of CSR practices among SMEs in Latvia. Policymakers, business executives, and other stakeholders interested in encouraging CSR practices among SMEs could benefit from the findings of this study.


Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and Sustainability: An Investigation into the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability. Management Decision. 46. 433-448.

Argandona, A., & von Weltzien Hoivik, H. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility: One Size Does Not Fit All. Collecting Evidence from Europe. Journal of Business Ethics. 89 (Suppl. 3), 221–234

Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S.G. (2003). Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and The Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 12: 419-445.

Bikefe, G., Zubairu, U., Araga, S., Maitala, F., Ediuku, E., & Anyebe, D. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by small and medium enterprises (SMEs): a systematic review. Small Business International Review. 4. 16-33.

Boeger, N., Murray, R.H., & Villiers, C.L. (2008). Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review. 4(4), 497–505.

Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons. 34. 39-48.

Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society. 38(3), 268–295.

Carroll, A.B. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR Construct’s Development and Future. Business & Society, 60(6), 1258–1278.

Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau of Latvia. (2022). Annual Report 2022. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

Cross-Sectoral Coordination Centre of the Republic (CSCC) of Latvia (2022). National development planning documents. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

CSR Europe. (2022). Together for an Inclusive Green Deal. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from

CSRHub. (2023). ESG rating by Region – Europe. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from

Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How Corporate Social Responsibility is defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Vol. 15, pp.1-13

Deloitte. (2022). Timeline for the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, Retrieved April 10, 2023, from

Elkington, J. (2017). Enter the Triple Bottom Line. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from

Employers' Confederation of Latvia (LDDK) (2023) CSR platform and memorandum. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

Enterprise Europe Network. (2023). About the Enterprise Europe Network. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from

European Commission. (2015). Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, EU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR EMS Forum. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from

European Commission. (2018). Recommendations to the European Commission by the subgroup on “Corporate Social Responsibility” of the Multi-Stakeholder Platform on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in the EU Key recommendations from the subgroup on "Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from

European Commission. (2019). A European Green Deal. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from

European Commission. (2020). Corporate social responsibility & Responsible business conduct. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

European Commission. (2022). Corporate sustainability reporting, Retrieved April 10, 2023, from

European Investment Bank. (2023). Intermediated loans for SMEs, mid-caps and other priorities. Retrieved March 17, 2023, from

Glavas, A., & Piderit, S.K. (2009). How Does Doing Good Matter? Effects of Corporate Citizenship on Employees. Journal of Corporate Citizenship. 51-70.

Government of the Republic of Latvia. (2023). The 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

Groh, A., Liechtenstein, H., Lieser, K., & Biesinger, M. (2022). Venture capital and private equity country attractiveness (VCPECA) ranking 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2023, from

Heslin, P.A., & Ochoa, J.D. (2008). Understanding and Developing Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Organizational Dynamics. Vol. 37, pp. 125-144.

Hillman, A. J. & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal. 22(2), 125–139.

Hopkins, M., 2003. The Planetary Begin- CSR Matters. London: Earthscan

Husted, B.W., & Allen D.B. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms - Lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning. Vol.40(6), pp.594-610.

Idowu, S.O. (2013). CSR Europe. In: Idowu, S.O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A.D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

ILO. (2010). International Instruments and Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved March 20, 2023, from

Karnani, A. (2010). The case against corporate social responsibility. Wall Street Journal. 23, pp.1-5

Lankauskiene, R. (2011). CSR development problems in Lithuania: Evaluation of promoting and hindering factors. Social Responsibility Journal. 7. 604-621. 10.1108/17471111111175164.

Lu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Liang, M., Abrhám, J., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility performance and state promotion policies: a case study of The Baltic States. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 21(4), 1203-1224.

McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., & Wright, P.M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies. 43: 1-18.

Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia. (2023). Business environment. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from

Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia. (2020). Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia. (2023). Latvian National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for multinational enterprises. Retrieved April 21, 2023, from

Ministry of Welfare of the Republic of Latvia. (2020). What is corporate social responsibility? Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

Morsing, M., & Perrini, F. (2009). CSR in SMEs: do SMEs matter for the CSR agenda? Business Ethics: A European Review. 18. 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01544.x.

OECD. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: Partners for Progress. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from

OECD. (2018). Competitiveness in South East Europe: A Policy Outlook 2018, Competitiveness and Private Sector Development, OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD. (2018). The OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

Open Government Partnership. (2022). Latvia - Current Action Plan. Retrieved April 21, 2023, from

Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D.S., & Waldman, D.A. (2011). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability. Business & Society. 50(1), 6–27.

Petersons, A., & King, G. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Latvia: A benchmark study. Baltic Journal of Management. 4. 106-118. 10.1108/17465260910930485.

Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. How to Reinvent Capitalism—and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business Review. 89. 62-77

Schwartz, M.S., & Carroll, A.B. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly. 13, 503-530.

The World Bank (2023). Report on Latvia. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

The World Bank. (2010). Latvia - The transition to a market economy. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from

UNESCO. (2019). Culture|2030 Indicators. Retrieved March 14, 2023, from

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2018). Voluntary National Reviews Synthesis Report. Retrieved April 21, 2023, from

Werther, W., & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons. 48. 317-324.






Managerial Aspects of European Integration